Hidden Cameras on the Arizona Border

So Obama, The federal Government and the Department of Justice, is suing the State of Arizona for trying to protect herself. Someone with a clear mind and some sort of common sense, can figure out, what this administration's motives are. It doesn't matter to them that this President's numbers are plummeting and the overwhelming majority of this country are against this law suit. What do you think their agenda really is?

1. Political posturing for the hispanic vote?
2. Create a crisis, to pass more government regulations?
3. To make sure that the economy really collapses (The first thing socialists do, in order to do away with capitalism)?
4. Create a racial divide among all, via, NAACP, New Black Panther Party, The Tea Party... To distract, divert the focus on them, by passing legislation during the late hours behind close doors. Oh, they've already done that one.

Take a pick or add more as they come along.

Socialism garbed in the new "Progressive movement."

Below is a portion of the book: The Progressive Movement and the Transformation of American Politics
Published on July 18, 2007 by Thomas West and William Schambra

"While the Progressives differed in their assessment of the problems and how to resolve them, they generally shared in common the view that government at every level must be actively involved in these reforms. The existing constitutional system was outdated and must be made into a dynamic, evolving instrument of social change, aided by scientific knowledge and the development of administrative bureaucracy.

At the same time, the old system was to be opened up and made more democratic; hence, the direct elections of Senators, the open primary, the initiative and referendum. It also had to be made to provide for more revenue; hence, the Sixteenth Amendment and the progressive income tax.

Presidential leadership would provide the unity of direction -- the vision -- needed for true progressive government. "All that progressives ask or desire," wrote Woodrow Wilson, "is permission -- in an era when development, evolution, is a scientific word -- to interpret the Constitution according to the Darwinian principle; all they ask is recognition of the fact that a nation is a living thing and not a machine."